Development Partners International LLP (“DPI LLP”, “DPI” or the “Firm”) is a regulated financial institution, acting as an investment adviser, providing investment advice on private market transactions, principally pan-African private equity investments (“Portfolio Company “, Portfolio Companies”, “Investment” or “Investments”) through diversified collective investment schemes (the “ADP Funds” or “Funds”).
DPI believes that effective management of environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) issues, as well as activities related to the achievement of the United Nation Sustainable Development Goals, is essential to the long-term success of these Portfolio Companies and the development of the markets in which they operate. Therefore, responsible investment (‘RI’) means investing in sustainable businesses, whilst also delivering competitive returns and generating positive environmental and social outcomes supported by strong governance. As a responsible investment advisor, DPI, through the Investments by the Funds it advises, is also committed to its core stewardship objective of active engagement and aims to use its influence over the Portfolio Companies to maximise long-term value.
The key tenets of RI, which have been a part of the DPI DNA since its inception, were formalised by the DPI partners through approval of the updated versions of DPI Impact Management system (DPImpact) and the DPI ESG Management System (DPIms) in December 2025. As such this policy has been updated, from those foundations, to ensure the responsible management of iESG matters at each of DPI’s Portfolio Companies. This policy seeks to set out DPI’s commitment to the integration and management of material iESG risks and opportunities across the Firm’s investment process, from origination to exit, as well as DPI’s approach to iESG value creation and stewardship.
DPI has a mission to drive positive, long-lasting social, environmental and economic impact across Africa. This is reflected in the Fund’s intentionality to contribute towards the UN Sustainable Development Goals (“SDGs”) and create impact within the Portfolio Companies across gender equality, job growth and job quality, and climate change. DPI also seeks to identify additional impact themes specific to each Portfolio Company, such as financial inclusion, access to health products or food, and support in scaling the businesses to increase the reach of the company’s products and services.
Impact considerations, alongside ESG issues (together “iESG”), are firmly integrated into the DPI investment process. This allows the Firm to measure and monitor the iESG performance of Portfolio Companies against the Funds impact objectives, as well as their contribution towards the SDGs.
The PRI (one of the pillars in DPIs reference framework – see below) defines stewardship as “the use of influence by institutional investors to maximise overall long-term value including the value of common economic, social and environmental assets, on which returns and clients’ and beneficiaries’ interests depend”. DPI, through the Investments it proposes to the Funds, seeks to exert its influence by collaborating, as a shareholder, with the board of directors of each of the Portfolio Companies – through both active engagement and voting (for example, through voting rights and board resolutions). DPI also extends its stewardship to supporting Portfolio Companies’ management teams with implementing changes necessary to align with international best practices through the provision of example, template and advice, providing access to financing or expert network and reviewing outputs.
DPI is a member of the Global Impact Investing Network, the Initiative Climat International, a signatory of the Operating Principles for Impact Management and a qualified investment of the 2X Global Challenge, drawing on guidance from industry bodies, as set out below, in applying its impact framework
This policy applies to each of the Funds, with adoption across the Firm by all DPI staff members and partners.
DPI’s RI Policy is guided by its duty to iESG matters and the approach has been developed from internationally recognised iESG principles and standards. These pillars form part of DPI’s Reference Framework surrounding iESG, and include but are not limited to:
These standards provide guiding principles in addressing environmental, social, governance, stewardship and human rights factors across investments in each of the Portfolio companies.
DPI has been developing these principles since inception, with each Investment reviewed on its own merits. As such these principles are applied on a case-by-case basis, where DPI believes it can add the most value at the time of investment, but often cannot be applied retrospectively. In specific cases, especially with separately managed accounts (“SMA”), DPI will apply the RI policy as deemed appropriate.
DPI has committed to providing sufficient resources for the effective implementation of responsible investment and the Firm’s ESG and Impact Management Systems (DPImpact and DPIms). This includes providing DPI staff and partners with knowledge, training and tools to enable them to identify and manage iESG matters across the Funds. This includes having dedicated staff responsible and accountable for the day-to-day implementation of the policy as well as the use of external subject matter experts where appropriate. The overall responsibility of implementation of this policy also lies with the senior management of the Firm, with oversight from the CEO.
iESG, RI and stewardship are embedded across the firm’s investment cycle from screening and due diligence, through to monitoring and exit. This is illustrated by the DPIms, as set out below:

DPIms is reviewed on an annual basis to address industry developments, or any new material ESG matters which may arise from time to time. DPImpact is verified every 2 to 3 years against the framework of the Operating Principles for Impact Management (“OPIM”).
The Firm has also developed a governance toolkit to ensure that boards at the Portfolio Company level are equipped to make decisions, with oversight from DPI, for a sustainable long-term outlook.
DPI has a dedicated team (“iESG Team”) that is responsible for the implementation of both the DPIms and DPImpact. The team is headed by the Head of iESG, who reports directly to the CEO. The iESG team has the ultimate responsibility for overall management of iESG issues, including developing, implementing and supervising the DPIms and DPImpact, as well as ensuring all RI and iESG matters are extended to all staff.
The Head of iESG is responsible for the integration of iESG matters across the investment process, as well as the application of the DPIms and DPImpact. The iESG team includes ESG and Impact experts and specialists, whose role it is to identify, assess and manage iESG risks and opportunities, including conducting operational level iESG due diligence, monitoring of each of the Portfolio Companies and reporting of Funds iESG activities.
The Investment Committee of the Firm analyses iESG issues and opportunities as an integral part of the investment decision-making process.
Post-investment, the investment professionals working with the Value Creation team, are responsible for deal assessments and on-going monitoring of Portfolio Companies. This includes formal governance through board positions which ensures the progress against the iESG Action Plans and implementation of the DPI stewardship approach.
DPI supports the Portfolio Companies in addressing and mitigating ESG risks, whilst still aiming to maximise the impact value creation opportunities, by ensuring compliance with international standards and best practice.
The Firm encourages Portfolio Companies to reduce ESG risks and improve their overall sustainability performance on a continuous basis through:
The Firm seeks to invest responsibly by ensuring transparency and communicating its process, goals and progress against clearly defined action plans with all relevant stakeholders, including investors, prospective portfolio companies, and industry organisations.
To support its commitment to the UNPRI and contribute towards improvements within the private equity industry, DPI engages with stakeholders on iESG matters by:
Further detailed engagement practices on stewardship are set out later in this policy document.
The Firm reports on its responsible investment approach and activities through its Annual ESG Report to investors, highlighting ESG performance across the Funds and underlying Portfolio Companies. In addition, ESG metrics surrounding employment and health and safety statistics are included within the Firm Portfolio Report which is issued to investors on a quarterly basis.
DPI also publishes an Impact report, on an annual basis, providing further information on its impact management and monitoring process as well as Portfolio Company-level results and have committed to publishing a TCFD aligned report which will transition to an IFRS aligned report when DPI reaches the obligation threshold.
This policy has been approved by the senior management of the Firm, the DPI Partnership and will be reviewed on a regular basis. This is the second iteration of the policy.
This Policy addresses key ESG factors and includes the following:
These exclusions apply to all Investments; Funds will not invest in the following ‘Prohibited Activities:
* provided that (o), (p) or (q) shall not be Prohibited Activities if such activities contribute 10% or less of the annual turnover of the (Investee) Portfolio Company and its Associates or assets used for such activities represent 10% or less of the value of the assets of its balance sheet (on a consolidated basis where appropriate), or represents 10% or less of the financed volume (which means the activities being financed by the investment by the Partnership), or, in Financial Institutions, if financing of such activities account for 10% or less of the Institution’s portfolio volume (which means that, where an Investee Company is engaged in the business of lending, no more than 10% of the sums advanced are advanced to finance such activities);
DPI is committed to protecting the environment and minimising the effects of climate change through its activities. As part of this, the Funds commit to:
In addition, DPI will work with Portfolio Companies where applicable to ensure each company implements and complies with environmental policies and guidelines that accord with the following key principles:
DPI seeks to work with Portfolio Companies to ensure they implement and comply with the following workplace policies, principles and guidelines that accord with the key internationally accepted norms and standards on labour related issues:
Navigating the complexities of human rights (“HR”) and addressing Gender-Based Violence and Harassment (GBVH) requires a foundational understanding that human rights are inherent and inalienable entitlements of all individuals, regardless of gender, or any other characteristic. GBVH, a severe violation of these rights, encompasses any harmful act directed at an individual based on their gender. DPI has clearly defined the Human Rights and GBVH related terms, internally and with its Portfolio Companies.
DPI emphasises the importance of promoting equality, preventing violence and challenging harmful norms. For its investments, DPI assesses, early in the process, potential risks related to Human Rights (HR) and Gender-Based Violence and Harassment (GBVH) and is committed to assessing and contributing to mitigating those risks. This is done through screening on HR and GBVH related risks, further assessments during due diligence, and an Action Plan to contribute to remedies for people affected.
It is vital for a credible corporate culture of integrity to be underpinned by effective direction, processes, control and reporting. For this specific reason, DPI only makes Investments in entities that can exhibit honesty, integrity, fairness, diligence and respect in all business dealings.
DPI uses reasonable commercial efforts to encourage Portfolio Companies to maintain sound corporate governance practices as are customary and commonly applied by entities organised under the laws of their respective jurisdictions of organisation.
Appropriate governance structures are implemented to provide adequate levels of oversight in the areas of audit, risk management, and potential conflicts of interest, and to implement compensation and other policies that align the interests of owners and management.
To this effect, DPI contractually requires that the Portfolio Companies in which it makes Investments will:
DPI engages with its Portfolio Companies to encourage proactive ESG disclosures, board and management diversity, and long-term sustainable business practices.
DPI advocates strong corporate governance structures that enhance transparency, accountability, and stakeholder inclusivity. The Firm also measures and reports on the impact of the Investments, considering social, environmental, and economic aspects on a periodic basis
Direct engagement is carried out with both the management teams and the boards of each of the Portfolio Companies at all stages of the investment process, through the life of the Investment and ultimate exit.
DPI is an advocate of strong corporate governance structures that enhance transparency, accountability, and stakeholder inclusivity. As part of this goal, transparent reporting mechanisms are being established to provide stakeholders with meaningful information about ESG performance and progress toward impact goals. In addition, DPI has a well-developed toolkit on corporate governance, as illustrated below, with Portfolio Companies, that enable the Firm to address many of the facets of good stewardship.

DPI’s commitment to effective stewardship involves a multi-tiered approach to engagement with Portfolio Companies. While direct dialogue and collaborative engagement are primary tools, DPI recognises that situations may arise where a more robust and escalated approach is necessary to achieve desired outcomes or address material risks. This section outlines the framework for escalating stewardship activities.
Principles of Escalation
Escalation trigger and actions
The escalation process typically follows a progressive series of actions, though the specific path may vary depending on the context and urgency of the issue.
DPI recognises that effective stewardship extends beyond individual Portfolio Companies to the broader markets, systems and frameworks in which they operate. In line with DPI’s commitment to the Principles for Responsible Investment, the Firm engages with policy makers, regulators and standard setters — directly and through industry bodies and collaborative initiatives — to promote well-functioning, transparent and sustainable financial markets. DPI’s public policy engagement focuses on issues that are financially material to the Funds and to the long-term interests of the Firm’s clients and beneficiaries, including climate change, nature, human rights, corporate governance and the integrity of disclosure and reporting standards.
DPI conducts policy engagement in a manner consistent with its fiduciary duty and responsible investment beliefs and seeks to ensure that any positions taken on its behalf by trade associations and coalitions are aligned with those beliefs. Where material inconsistencies arise, they will be raised and, where appropriate, DPI’s participation will be reviewed. The Firm maintains appropriate oversight of its policy engagement activity and reports on it transparently, in keeping with the PRI’s reporting framework and evolving expectations on system-level and “beyond investee company” stewardship.
Stewardship activities with policy makers, participation in open letters, calls to action, sign-on letters, policy consultations, industry led working groups or review of proposed legislation must be discussed and approved by the Partnership after verification that they align with this policy.
DPI is committed to understanding and reflecting the interests, expectations and, where relevant, the sustainability preferences of its clients and beneficiaries in the way it invests. Consistent with its responsibilities under the Principles for Responsible Investment, the Firm seeks to communicate clearly on how environmental, social and governance factors are integrated into investment decisions and stewardship activities, and to provide accessible, accurate and timely reporting on the approach, voting and engagement, and relevant outcomes. This supports the objective of promoting acceptance and implementation of responsible investment throughout the investment chain and of enhancing our overall effectiveness and accountability.
DPI provides opportunities for clients and beneficiaries to understand its responsible investment policy and, where appropriate, to express their views on material ESG and sustainability matters, taking these into account within the bounds of the Firm’s fiduciary duty and the mandates managed. DPI aims to manage any differing preferences transparently and consistently, and to use client and beneficiary insight to inform the ongoing development of its responsible investment approach.
The Firm will engage directly with its clients during Annual Investor Meetings, LP advisory committees or the annual impact forum to share the approach and results relating to Impact and ESG. The Firm will also maintain close relationships with the Impact and ESG teams of its investors to ensure transparency and collegiality such that it is able to leverage the expertise available.
1 As defined by the ILO Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention (No. 87) and the Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining Convention (No. 98). See https://www.ilo.org/ilolex/english/docs/declworld.htm
2 Respecting any collective bargaining agreements that are in place or where these do not exist or do not address working conditions, make reference to conditions established, by collective agreement or otherwise, for work in the trade or industry concerned in the area / region where the work is carried out. and local or national law, IFC Performance Standard 2 and relevant ILO Conventions. For working hours, see also, the ILO Hours of Work (Industry) Convention (No.1) (see https://www.ilo.org/global/standards/subjects-covered-by-international-labour-standards/workingtime/%20lang–en/index.htm)
3 See IFC Performance Standard 2 and the “Effectiveness Criteria for Non-Judicial Grievance Mechanisms” within the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (GuidingPrinciplesBusinessHR_EN.pdf (ohchr.org) for guidance.
4As covered by the ILO Equal Remuneration Convention (No. 100) and the ILO Discrimination (Employment and Occupation) Convention (No. 111), allowance could be made where positive discrimination is mandated in law and is intended to address a historical imbalance. See https://www.ilo.org/ilolex/english/docs/declworld.htm